Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GRBK scored 32.0, TOL scored 51.0 — TOL leads.
Compare another set
GRBK
Green Brick Partners, Inc.
Residential Construction · Quality-Growth
32
$62.86 · $2.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
19.0
TOL leads
TOL
Toll Brothers, Inc.
Residential Construction · Quality-Growth
51
$133.13 · $12.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestGRBK9.5x
Fastest growthTOL-1.1%
Strongest balance sheetGRBK0.14
Highest qualityTOL77 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueTOL-1%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
GRBK
stronger →← stronger
TOL
74
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
77
15
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
26
29
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
65
TOL is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
GRBK
TOL
$112mC
FCF
$1.1bC+
-5.5%D
Rev
-1.1%D+
0.14A
D/E
0.34A-
9.5xA-
P/E
10.7xA-
—
PEG
0.87B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
GRBK
TOL
218% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
1% below
~30%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~2%/yr
-65%
1-yr DCF upside
+4%
-69%
5-yr DCF upside
+1%
-72%
10-yr DCF upside
-4%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
GRBK
Why this score
Durable high returns
TOL
Why this score
Buying back stock
Raising its dividend
Durable high returns
The companies
GRBKGreen Brick Partners, Inc.
Residential Construction · $62.86 · beta 1.76
Why now
Residential Construction · market cap $2.7b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $83.18 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -5% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating.
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 15% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Revenue contracting -5% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Beta 1.76 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
TOLToll Brothers, Inc.
Residential Construction · $133.13 · beta 1.30
Why now
Residential Construction · market cap $12.3b. Down 21% from 52-week high of $168.36 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.87 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $170.88 (implying +28% upside).
Moat
ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where GRBK and TOL diverge
On the headline score the gap is 19.0 points in favor of TOL. The widest single difference is Value, where TOL leads by 35.8 points.
ValueGRBK 29.2 · TOL 65.0TOL +35.8
GrowthGRBK 15.2 · TOL 26.5TOL +11.3
QualityGRBK 73.7 · TOL 76.8TOL +3.1
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is TOL or GRBK the better stock?
TOL scores higher: TOL 51.0, GRBK 32.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do TOL and GRBK differ most?
The widest gap is value, where TOL leads by 36 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. TOL leads all three pillars, so the gap is broad rather than a single-measure difference.
How are TOL and GRBK scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.