COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
GPOR vs PR
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GPOR scored 64.5, PR scored 57.8 — GPOR leads.
Compare another set
GPOR
Gulfport Energy Corporation
64.5
$173.45 · $3.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
6.7
GPOR leads
PR
Permian Resources Corporation
57.8
$23.75 · $19.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestGPOR6.6x
- Fastest growthGPOR+35.2%
- Strongest balance sheetPR0.26
- Highest qualityGPOR77 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueGPOR-41%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
GPOR
stronger →← stronger
PR
77
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
61
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
70
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
64
GPOR is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
GPOR
PR
$250mC
FCF
$1.1bC+
+35.2%A
Rev
+12.8%B+
0.50B
D/E
0.26A-
6.6xA
P/E
15.3xB
0.36A
PEG
1.36B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
GPOR
PR
41% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
34% above
~-1%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~9%/yr
+38%
1-yr DCF upside
-23%
+68%
5-yr DCF upside
-26%
+124%
10-yr DCF upside
-30%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
GPOR
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
PR
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
- Cut its dividend
- Cyclical growth
The companies
GPORGulfport Energy Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $3.1b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $225.78 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +35% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.36 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $227.08 (implying +31% upside).
Moat
Net margin 32% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
PRPermian Resources Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $19.9b. Trading near 52-week high of $24.09 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $25.79 (implying +9% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Trading within 1% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. ROE 3% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate. Production-cost sensitivity — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the cycle while marginal producers burn it; watch the cost-per-unit trend, not just headline revenue.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where GPOR and PR diverge
On the headline score the gap is 6.7 points in favor of GPOR. The widest single difference is Quality, where GPOR leads by 16.1 points.
- QualityGPOR 76.6 · PR 60.5GPOR +16.1
- ValueGPOR 70.0 · PR 63.7GPOR +6.3
- GrowthGPOR 50.0 · PR 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.