Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GPOR scored 63.9, NE scored 34.7 — GPOR leads.
Compare another set
GPOR
Gulfport Energy Corporation
Oil & Gas E&P · Quality-Growth
63.9
$162.66 · $2.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
29.2
GPOR leads
NE
Noble Corporation plc
Oil & Gas Drilling · Quality-Growth
34.7
$42.36 · $6.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestGPOR6.5x
Fastest growthGPOR+42.5%
Strongest balance sheetNE0.43
Highest qualityGPOR76 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueGPOR-55%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
GPOR
stronger →← stronger
NE
76
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
55
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
45
69
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
17
GPOR is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
GPOR
NE
$250mC
FCF
$284mC
+42.5%A
Rev
-11.1%D
0.50B
D/E
0.43B+
6.5xA
P/E
45.1xC
0.69A-
PEG
0.61A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
GPOR
NE
55% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
3% above
~-11%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~16%/yr
+108%
1-yr DCF upside
-26%
+124%
5-yr DCF upside
-3%
+151%
10-yr DCF upside
+42%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
GPOR
Why this score
Cyclical growth
NE
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
GPORGulfport Energy Corporation
Oil & Gas E&P · $162.66 · beta 0.56
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $2.9b. Down 28% from 52-week high of $225.78 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +43% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.69 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $213.31 (implying +31% upside).
Moat
Net margin 36% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
NENoble Corporation plc
Oil & Gas Drilling · $42.36 · beta 1.01
Why now
Oil & Gas Drilling · market cap $6.8b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $54.98 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -11% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. PEG 0.61 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $48.55 (implying +15% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 190% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Revenue contracting -11% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Dividend payout 213% of earnings on a 4.8% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. Trailing P/E 45x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where GPOR and NE diverge
On the headline score the gap is 29.2 points in favor of GPOR. The widest single difference is Value, where GPOR leads by 51.7 points.
ValueGPOR 68.5 · NE 16.8GPOR +51.7
QualityGPOR 76.2 · NE 54.8GPOR +21.4
GrowthGPOR 50.0 · NE 45.4GPOR +4.6
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is GPOR or NE the better stock?
GPOR scores higher: GPOR 63.9, NE 34.7 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do GPOR and NE differ most?
The widest gap is value, where GPOR leads by 52 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. GPOR leads all three pillars, so the gap is broad rather than a single-measure difference.
How are GPOR and NE scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.