COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
GPOR vs MUR
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GPOR scored 64.5, MUR scored 54.1 — GPOR leads.
Compare another set
GPOR
Gulfport Energy Corporation
64.5
$173.45 · $3.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
10.4
GPOR leads
MUR
Murphy Oil Corporation
54.1
$37.41 · $5.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestGPOR6.6x
- Fastest growthGPOR+35.2%
- Strongest balance sheetMUR0.42
- Highest qualityGPOR77 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueGPOR-41%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
GPOR
stronger →← stronger
MUR
77
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
58
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
70
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
55
GPOR is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
GPOR
MUR
$250mC
FCF
$222mC
+35.2%A
Rev
+7.7%B
0.50B
D/E
0.42B+
6.6xA
P/E
18.5xB
0.36A
PEG
0.33A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
GPOR
MUR
41% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
1% above
~-1%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~3%/yr
+38%
1-yr DCF upside
-1%
+68%
5-yr DCF upside
-1%
+124%
10-yr DCF upside
-2%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
GPOR
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
MUR
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Cyclical growth
The companies
GPORGulfport Energy Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $3.1b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $225.78 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +35% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.36 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $227.08 (implying +31% upside).
Moat
Net margin 32% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
MURMurphy Oil Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $5.4b. 14% off the 52-week high of $43.34. PEG 0.33 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 14 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $39.93 (implying +7% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
ROE 6% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate. Production-cost sensitivity — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the cycle while marginal producers burn it; watch the cost-per-unit trend, not just headline revenue.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where GPOR and MUR diverge
On the headline score the gap is 10.4 points in favor of GPOR. The widest single difference is Quality, where GPOR leads by 18.5 points.
- QualityGPOR 76.6 · MUR 58.1GPOR +18.5
- ValueGPOR 70.0 · MUR 54.6GPOR +15.4
- GrowthGPOR 50.0 · MUR 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.