COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
EOG vs GPOR
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. EOG scored 61.3, GPOR scored 64.5 — GPOR leads.
Compare another set
EOG
EOG Resources, Inc.
61.3
$153.05 · $80.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
3.2
GPOR leads
GPOR
Gulfport Energy Corporation
64.5
$173.45 · $3.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestGPOR6.6x
- Fastest growthGPOR+35.2%
- Strongest balance sheetEOG0.26
- Highest qualityEOG92 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueGPOR-41%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
EOG
stronger →← stronger
GPOR
92
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
77
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
50
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
70
EOG and GPOR split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
EOG
GPOR
$6.6bB+
FCF
$250mC
+19.1%B+
Rev
+35.2%A
0.26A-
D/E
0.50B
11.9xB+
P/E
6.6xA
1.19B+
PEG
0.36A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
EOG
GPOR
1% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
41% below
~-2%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-1%/yr
+12%
1-yr DCF upside
+38%
+1%
5-yr DCF upside
+68%
-13%
10-yr DCF upside
+124%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
EOG
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
GPOR
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
The companies
EOGEOG Resources, Inc.
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $80.3b. Trading near 52-week high of $153.67 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +19%, comfortably above the S&P median. 27 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $158.93 (implying +4% upside).
Moat
Net margin 25% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 22% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 96% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trading within 0% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Commodity exposure — earnings power tracks the price of the underlying commodity, not management execution. A 15-20% move in the commodity reprices the equity well before fundamentals catch up.
GPORGulfport Energy Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $3.1b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $225.78 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +35% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.36 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $227.08 (implying +31% upside).
Moat
Net margin 32% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where EOG and GPOR diverge
On the headline score the gap is 3.2 points in favor of GPOR. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueEOG 50.0 · GPOR 70.0GPOR +20.0
- QualityEOG 92.2 · GPOR 76.6EOG +15.6
- GrowthEOG 50.0 · GPOR 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.