COMPARE · Data as of August 28, 2026
GPN vs KFY
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GPN scored 53.3, KFY scored 71.6 — KFY leads.
Compare another set
GPN
Global Payments Inc.
53.3
$91.82 · $24.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
18.3
KFY leads
KFY
Korn Ferry
71.6
$86.28 · $4.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestKFY16.5x
- Fastest growthGPN+32.5%
- Strongest balance sheetKFY0.30
- Highest qualityKFY76 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueKFY-6%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
GPN
stronger →← stronger
KFY
35
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
76
67
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
68
65
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
70
KFY is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
GPN
KFY
$823mC+
FCF
$324mC
+32.5%A
Rev
+6.4%C+
0.98C+
D/E
0.30A-
43.9xC
P/E
16.5xA-
0.27A
PEG
1.20B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
GPN
KFY
21% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
6% below
~15%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~5%/yr
-31%
1-yr DCF upside
-1%
-17%
5-yr DCF upside
+7%
+8%
10-yr DCF upside
+20%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
GPN
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
KFY
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
The companies
GPNGlobal Payments Inc.
Why now
Specialty Business Services · market cap $24.3b. 4% off the 52-week high of $95.88. Revenue growing +33% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.27 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 28 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $103.00 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -9.1%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Trailing P/E 44x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. ROE -4% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
KFYKorn Ferry
Why now
Staffing & Employment Services · market cap $4.4b. Trading near 52-week high of $87.51 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. 4 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $81.00 (implying -6% upside).
Moat
ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 117% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trading within 1% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where GPN and KFY diverge
On the headline score the gap is 18.3 points in favor of KFY. The widest single difference is Quality, where KFY leads by 41.7 points.
- QualityGPN 34.8 · KFY 76.5KFY +41.7
- ValueGPN 64.8 · KFY 70.4KFY +5.6
- GrowthGPN 67.2 · KFY 68.2level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.