COMPARE · Reviewed July 2, 2026
GPI vs KTB
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GPI scored 77, KTB scored 76.3 — GPI ahead by 0.7000000000000028.
GPI
Group 1 Automotive, Inc.
77
$288.39
Score gap
0.7000000000000028
GPI leads
KTB
Kontoor Brands, Inc.
76.3
$85.00
The companies
GPIGroup 1 Automotive, Inc.
Why now
Auto & Truck Dealerships · market cap $3.4b. Down 41% from 52-week high of $488.39 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.35 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $434.50 (implying +51% upside).
Moat
ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 100% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 41% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 1.5% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
KTBKontoor Brands, Inc.
Why now
Apparel Manufacturing · market cap $4.7b. Trading near 52-week high of $87.00 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +21%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.82 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $92.40 (implying +9% upside).
Moat
ROE 45% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 144% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 2.06 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
Base grades (each contributes ~14.3% of base composite)
| GPI | Component | KTB |
|---|---|---|
| C65 | FCF | C65 |
| B+85 | Rev | A-90 |
| C+70 | D/E | C65 |
| A-90 | P/E or P/S | B+85 |
| A95 | PEG | B+85 |
| Supplemental signals · feed the score, not on the row card | ||
| A-90 | FCF Yield | A-90 |
| B80 | ROE | A95 |
| 83.2 | Base composite | 82.7 |
Adjustments (signed deltas applied on top of base)
GPI
GARP sweet spot (PEG <1, positive FCF)+1
analyst consensus bullish (83% buy/strong-buy)+2
forward P/E cheaper (11 → 6)+1
DCF cross-check (avg upside 107%)+2
Total+6
KTB
GARP sweet spot (PEG <1, positive FCF)+1
analyst consensus bullish (70% buy/strong-buy)+2
covered yield (2.5% at 42% payout)+1
DCF cross-check (avg upside 117%)+2
Total+6
DCF cross-check (per-share value vs. live price)
| GPI upside | Horizon | KTB upside |
|---|---|---|
| +78% | 1Y | +58% |
| +101% | 5Y | +102% |
| +140% | 10Y | +190% |
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.