COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CVNA vs GPI
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CVNA scored 67.9, GPI scored 60.8 — CVNA leads.
Compare another set
CVNA
Carvana Co.
67.9
$69.91 · $104.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
7.1
CVNA leads
GPI
Group 1 Automotive, Inc.
60.8
$261.85 · $3.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestGPI10.8x
- Fastest growthCVNA+54.0%
- Strongest balance sheetCVNA1.11
- Highest qualityCVNA68 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueGPI-12%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CVNA
stronger →← stronger
GPI
68
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
68
94
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
49
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
67
CVNA and GPI split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CVNA
GPI
$929mC+
FCF
$166mC
+54.0%A
Rev
+0.8%C
1.11B
D/E
1.96C+
37.0xC
P/E
10.8xA-
0.98B+
PEG
0.33A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CVNA
GPI
377% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
12% below
~58%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~5%/yr
-84%
1-yr DCF upside
-1%
-79%
5-yr DCF upside
+13%
-69%
10-yr DCF upside
+37%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CVNA
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
GPI
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
CVNACarvana Co.
Why now
Auto & Truck Dealerships · market cap $104.0b. Down 28% from 52-week high of $97.38 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +54% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.98 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $82.83 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
ROE 39% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. $104.0b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Beta 3.49 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trailing P/E 37x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
GPIGroup 1 Automotive, Inc.
Why now
Auto & Truck Dealerships · market cap $3.1b. Down 46% from 52-week high of $488.39 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.33 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $371.08 (implying +42% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Down 46% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 1.3% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CVNA and GPI diverge
On the headline score the gap is 7.1 points in favor of CVNA. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthCVNA 93.8 · GPI 49.7CVNA +44.1
- ValueCVNA 49.0 · GPI 66.7GPI +17.7
- QualityCVNA 68.0 · GPI 67.8level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.