COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
GNTX vs XPEV
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GNTX scored 71.2, XPEV scored 29.9 — GNTX leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. GNTX's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but XPEV's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
GNTX
Gentex Corporation
71.2
$23.64 · $5.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
41.3
GNTX leads
XPEV
XPeng Inc.
29.9
$12.19 · $11.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthXPEV+87.7%
- Strongest balance sheetGNTX0.00
- Highest qualityGNTX86 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueGNTX-46%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
GNTX
stronger →← stronger
XPEV
86
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
24
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
84
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
40
GNTX is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
GNTX
XPEV
$497mC
FCF
—
+10.1%B
Rev
+87.7%A
0.00A
D/E
0.83B
12.5xA-
P/E
—
0.73A-
PEG
—
—
P/S
1.1xB
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
GNTX
XPEV
46% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~-10%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
+79%
1-yr DCF upside
—
+86%
5-yr DCF upside
—
+97%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
GNTX
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
XPEV
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
- Foreign reporter (CNY)
The companies
GNTXGentex Corporation
Why now
Auto Parts · market cap $5.0b. 20% off the 52-week high of $29.38. Revenue growing +10%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.73 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 9 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $27.78 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 16% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 122% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
XPEVXPeng Inc.
Why now
Auto Manufacturers · market cap $11.7b. Down 57% from 52-week high of $28.23 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +88% — in hypergrowth territory. 25 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $22.15 (implying +82% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -1.5%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 57% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. ROE -4% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where GNTX and XPEV diverge
On the headline score the gap is 41.3 points in favor of GNTX. The widest single difference is Quality, where GNTX leads by 62.0 points.
- QualityGNTX 86.2 · XPEV 24.2GNTX +62.0
- ValueGNTX 83.7 · XPEV 40.0GNTX +43.7
- GrowthGNTX 50.0 · XPEV 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.