COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
CCU vs GIS
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CCU scored 58.7, GIS scored 22.1 — CCU leads.
Compare another set
CCU
Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S.A.
58.7
$12.66 · $2.3B
Score gap
36.6
CCU leads
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
22.1
$40.92 · $21.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthCCU+13.2%
- Strongest balance sheetCCU0.82
- Highest qualityCCU66 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueCCU-23%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CCU
stronger →← stronger
GIS
66
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
46
84
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
14
50
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
17
CCU is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CCU
GIS
$150mC
FCF
$1.6bC+
+13.2%B+
Rev
-5.4%D
0.82B
D/E
2.18C
20.4xB
P/E
—
1.73C+
PEG
11.74D
—
P/S
1.2xB
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CCU
GIS
23% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
11% below
~5%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~1%/yr
+7%
1-yr DCF upside
+11%
+30%
5-yr DCF upside
+13%
+70%
10-yr DCF upside
+15%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CCU
Why this score
- Durable high returns
- Cut its dividend
- Foreign reporter (CLP)
GIS
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
CCUCompañía Cervecerías Unidas S.A.
Why now
Beverages - Brewers · market cap $2.3b. 18% off the 52-week high of $15.36. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $11.64 (implying -8% upside).
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
GISGeneral Mills, Inc.
Why now
Packaged Foods · market cap $21.9b. Down 20% from 52-week high of $51.33 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -5% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 18 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $37.56 (implying -8% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
D/E 2.18 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Revenue contracting -5% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Currently unprofitable (margin -0.5%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CCU and GIS diverge
On the headline score the gap is 36.6 points in favor of CCU. The widest single difference is Growth, where CCU leads by 70.4 points.
- GrowthCCU 84.2 · GIS 13.8CCU +70.4
- ValueCCU 50.3 · GIS 17.2CCU +33.1
- QualityCCU 65.6 · GIS 45.7CCU +19.9
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.