COMPARE · Data as of August 13, 2026
GIC vs SITE
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GIC scored 62.6, SITE scored 63.4 — SITE leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. GIC's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but SITE's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
GIC
Global Industrial Company
62.6
$39.07 · $1.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.8
SITE leads
SITE
SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
63.4
$97.76 · $4.3B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
GIC
stronger →← stronger
SITE
83
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
56
56
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
61
53
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
75
SITE is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
GIC
SITE
$87mC-
FCF
$246mC
+8.4%B
Rev
+2.8%C
0.29A-
D/E
0.67B
17.7xA-
P/E
26.8xB
1.32B
PEG
1.24B
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
GIC
SITE
10% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
0% above
~1%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~13%/yr
+0%
1-yr DCF upside
-21%
-9%
5-yr DCF upside
0%
-22%
10-yr DCF upside
+38%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
GIC
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
SITE
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
GICGlobal Industrial Company
Why now
Industrial Distribution · market cap $1.5b. 4% off the 52-week high of $40.71.
Moat
ROE 25% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 100% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
SITESiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
Why now
Industrial Distribution · market cap $4.3b. Down 42% from 52-week high of $168.56 — deep drawdown territory. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $127.08 (implying +30% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 162% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 42% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 3.2% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where GIC and SITE diverge
On the headline score the gap is 0.8 points in favour of SITE. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityGIC 82.9 · SITE 56.0GIC +26.9
- ValueGIC 53.0 · SITE 75.1SITE +22.1
- GrowthGIC 55.8 · SITE 60.6SITE +4.8
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.