COMPARE · Data as of October 12, 2026

GFF vs SPXC

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GFF scored 73.6, SPXC scored 71.2 — GFF leads.
Compare another set
GFF
Griffon Corporation
Building Products & Equipment · Quality-Growth
73.6
$89.74 · $4.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
2.4
GFF leads
SPXC
SPX Technologies, Inc.
Building Products & Equipment · Quality-Growth
71.2
$168.45 · $8.4B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestGFF19.3x
  • Fastest growthGFF+26.9%
  • Highest qualityGFF79 / 100
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD73.6/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY78.9GROWTH65.5VALUE76.9
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD71.2/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY65.7GROWTH90.6VALUE60.6
GFFSPXCQuality78.965.7Growth65.590.6Value76.960.6
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)11%37%14x35xGFFSPXC

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFGFF$297mSPXC$303m
RevGFF+26.9%SPXC+20.6%
P/EGFF19.3xSPXC29.7x
PEGGFF0.54SPXC0.95
GFF
stronger →← stronger
SPXC
79
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
66
66
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
91
77
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
61
GFF is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
GFF
SPXC
$297mC
FCF
$303mC
+26.9%A-
Rev
+20.6%A-
—
D/E
0.26A-
19.3xB+
P/E
29.7xB
0.54A-
PEG
0.95B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
GFF
SPXC
25% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
67% above
~10%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~25%/yr
-20%
1-yr DCF upside
-49%
-20%
5-yr DCF upside
-40%
-19%
10-yr DCF upside
-24%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
GFF
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Raising its dividend
SPXC
Why this score
  • Durable high returns
  • Diluting shareholders
GFFGriffon Corporation
Building Products & Equipment · $89.74 · beta 1.44
Why now
Building Products & Equipment · market cap $4.1b. 17% off the 52-week high of $108.57. Revenue growing +27% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.54 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $126.86 (implying +41% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 166% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Beta 1.44 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
SPXCSPX Technologies, Inc.
Building Products & Equipment · $168.45 · beta 1.24
Why now
Building Products & Equipment · market cap $8.4b. Down 33% from 52-week high of $251.08 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +21%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.95 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 14 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $253.29 (implying +50% upside).
Moat
ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 109% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Down 33% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where GFF and SPXC diverge

On the headline score the gap is 2.4 points in favor of GFF. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.

Common questions

Is GFF or SPXC the better stock?

GFF scores higher: GFF 73.6, SPXC 71.2 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.

Where do GFF and SPXC differ most?

The widest gap is growth, where SPXC leads by 25 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.

How are GFF and SPXC scored?

Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.

How current is this comparison?

The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.