COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
GFF vs LIME
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GFF scored 77.9, LIME scored 76.9 — GFF leads.
Compare another set
GFF
Griffon Corporation
77.9
$100.13 · $4.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.0
GFF leads
LIME
Neutron Holdings, Inc.
76.9
$42.03 · $2.7B
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestLIME12.8x
- Fastest growthLIME+29.1%
- Highest qualityLIME91 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
GFF
stronger →← stronger
LIME
81
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
91
80
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
55
73
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
90
LIME is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
GFF
LIME
$297mC
FCF
—
+26.9%A-
Rev
+29.1%A-
—
D/E
0.20A-
20.9xB+
P/E
12.8xA-
0.54A-
PEG
—
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
GFF
LIME
8% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~11%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
-19%
1-yr DCF upside
—
-7%
5-yr DCF upside
—
+12%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
GFF
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
LIME
The companies
GFFGriffon Corporation
Why now
Building Products & Equipment · market cap $4.6b. 8% off the 52-week high of $108.57. Revenue growing +27% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.54 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $125.57 (implying +25% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 166% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
LIMENeutron Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Rental & Leasing Services · market cap $2.7b. Trading near 52-week high of $42.68 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +29% — in hypergrowth territory. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $39.43 (implying -6% upside).
Moat
Net margin 21% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close.
Risk
Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
GFF leads LIME by 1 point (77.9 to 76.9). A contrarian could still prefer LIME for its stronger P/E (grade A). Note they play different roles — GFF screens as value, LIME screens as growth — so the model rewards different traits for each.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where GFF and LIME diverge
On the headline score the gap is 1.0 points in favor of GFF. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthGFF 79.9 · LIME 55.4GFF +24.5
- ValueGFF 73.4 · LIME 90.3LIME +16.9
- QualityGFF 80.5 · LIME 90.9LIME +10.4
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.