Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GEV scored 69.4, HUBB scored 54.3 — GEV leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. GEV's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but HUBB's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
GEV
GE Vernova Inc.
Specialty Industrial Machinery · Quality-Growth
69.4
$1,004.73 · $267.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
15.1
GEV leads
HUBB
Hubbell Incorporated
Electrical Equipment & Parts · Quality-Growth
54.3
$474.11 · $25.0B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestHUBB28.1x
Fastest growthGEV+13.0%
Strongest balance sheetGEV0.28
Highest qualityGEV80 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
GEV
stronger →← stronger
HUBB
80
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
75
84
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
68
49
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
31
GEV is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
GEV
HUBB
$12.4bA-
FCF
$909mC+
+13.0%B+
Rev
+7.2%B
0.28A-
D/E
1.42C
28.8xB
P/E
28.1xB
1.96C+
PEG
1.98C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
GEV
HUBB
15% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
43% above
~12%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~16%/yr
-23%
1-yr DCF upside
-35%
-13%
5-yr DCF upside
-30%
+3%
10-yr DCF upside
-22%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Specialty Industrial Machinery · market cap $267.6b. 16% off the 52-week high of $1195.94. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. 33 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $1,225 (implying +22% upside).
Moat
Net margin 23% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 80% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 131% of net income, helped by cash released from working capital ($14.2b) that doesn't repeat every year.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
HUBBHubbell Incorporated
Electrical Equipment & Parts · $474.11 · beta 0.85
Why now
Electrical Equipment & Parts · market cap $25.0b. 16% off the 52-week high of $565.50. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $560.58 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 24% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 100% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where GEV and HUBB diverge
On the headline score the gap is 15.1 points in favor of GEV. The widest single difference is Value, where GEV leads by 18.3 points.
ValueGEV 49.4 · HUBB 31.1GEV +18.3
GrowthGEV 84.2 · HUBB 68.4GEV +15.8
QualityGEV 80.5 · HUBB 75.1GEV +5.4
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is GEV or HUBB the better stock?
GEV scores higher: GEV 69.4, HUBB 54.3 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do GEV and HUBB differ most?
The widest gap is value, where GEV leads by 18 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. GEV leads all three pillars, so the gap is broad rather than a single-measure difference.
How are GEV and HUBB scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.