COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026

GENI vs OPRA

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GENI scored 37.7, OPRA scored 72.5 — OPRA leads.
Compare another set
GENI
Genius Sports Limited
Internet Content & Information · Quality-Growth
37.7
$7.99 · $2.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
34.8
OPRA leads
OPRA
Opera Limited
Internet Content & Information · Quality-Growth
72.5
$18.86 · $1.7B
fundamentals as of
  • Fastest growthGENI+31.0%
  • Strongest balance sheetOPRA0.01
  • Highest qualityOPRA69 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueOPRA-20%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD37.7/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY24.5GROWTH93.9VALUE23.3
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD72.5/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY69.0GROWTH95.4VALUE57.8
GENIOPRAQuality24.569.0Growth93.995.4Value23.357.8
FCFGENI$65mOPRA$112m
RevGENI+31.0%OPRA+27.9%
D/EGENI1.20OPRA0.01
GENI
stronger →← stronger
OPRA
25
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
69
94
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
95
23
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
58
OPRA is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
GENI
OPRA
$65mC-
FCF
$112mC
+31.0%A
Rev
+27.9%A-
1.20C+
D/E
0.01A
3.2xC+
P/S
PEG
0.59A-
P/E
13.7xB+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
GENI
OPRA
142% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
20% below
~41%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~8%/yr
-68%
1-yr DCF upside
-2%
-59%
5-yr DCF upside
+25%
-42%
10-yr DCF upside
+78%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
GENI
No notable signals flagged.
OPRA
Why this score
  • Cut its dividend
GENIGenius Sports Limited
Internet Content & Information · $7.99 · beta 1.88
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $2.1b. Down 42% from 52-week high of $13.73 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +31% — in hypergrowth territory. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $10.93 (implying +37% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -16.7%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 42% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.88 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
OPRAOpera Limited
Internet Content & Information · $18.86 · beta 1.24
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $1.7b. 10% off the 52-week high of $21.06. Revenue growing +28% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.59 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $26.29 (implying +39% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 104% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Dividend payout 87% of earnings on a 4.2% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where GENI and OPRA diverge

On the headline score the gap is 34.8 points in favor of OPRA. The widest single difference is Quality, where OPRA leads by 44.5 points.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.