COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
GEN vs PCTY
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GEN scored 76.5, PCTY scored 81.9 — PCTY leads.
Compare another set
GEN
Gen Digital Inc.
76.5
$28.93 · $17.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
5.4
PCTY leads
PCTY
Paylocity Holding Corporation
81.9
$153.34 · $8.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestGEN16.9x
- Fastest growthGEN+20.2%
- Strongest balance sheetPCTY0.11
- Highest qualityPCTY92 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueGEN-29%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
GEN
stronger →← stronger
PCTY
80
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
92
92
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
87
61
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
68
PCTY is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
GEN
PCTY
$1.5bC+
FCF
$497mC
+20.2%A-
Rev
+12.2%B+
3.08D
D/E
0.11B+
16.9xA-
P/E
31.2xB
1.39B
PEG
1.21B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
GEN
PCTY
29% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
3% below
~0%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~7%/yr
+25%
1-yr DCF upside
-7%
+41%
5-yr DCF upside
+3%
+69%
10-yr DCF upside
+20%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
GEN
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
PCTY
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
The companies
GENGen Digital Inc.
Why now
Software - Infrastructure · market cap $17.3b. 8% off the 52-week high of $31.57. Revenue growing +20%, comfortably above the S&P median. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $32.11 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
Net margin 21% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 40% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 147% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 3.08 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
PCTYPaylocity Holding Corporation
Why now
Software - Application · market cap $8.5b. 16% off the 52-week high of $182.36. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $172.00 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
Net margin 16% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 22% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 184% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 31x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. AI-native re-pricing — GPT-class models are compressing the cost of features that took years to build; the moat thesis depends on owning the workflow, not just the feature set.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where GEN and PCTY diverge
On the headline score the gap is 5.4 points in favor of PCTY. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityGEN 80.1 · PCTY 92.3PCTY +12.2
- ValueGEN 60.6 · PCTY 68.0PCTY +7.4
- GrowthGEN 92.1 · PCTY 87.3GEN +4.8
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.