COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026

GEF-B vs SLGN

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GEF-B scored 54.3, SLGN scored 59.1 — SLGN leads.
Compare another set
GEF-B
Greif, Inc.
Packaging & Containers · Quality-Growth
54.3
$111.43 · $4.2B
Score gap
4.8
SLGN leads
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.
Packaging & Containers · Quality-Growth
59.1
$42.39 · $4.5B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestSLGN16.6x
  • Fastest growthSLGN+8.4%
  • Strongest balance sheetGEF-B0.39
  • Highest qualityGEF-B59 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueSLGN-40%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD54.3/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY58.9GROWTH56.5VALUE48.2
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD59.1/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY53.7GROWTH72.3VALUE53.2
GEF-BSLGNQuality58.953.7Growth56.572.3Value48.253.2
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-6%18%12x36xGEF-BSLGN

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFGEF-B$188mSLGN$343m
RevGEF-B+4.3%SLGN+8.4%
D/EGEF-B0.39SLGN2.03
P/EGEF-B30.7xSLGN16.6x
PEGGEF-B0.67SLGN0.79
GEF-B
stronger →← stronger
SLGN
59
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
54
57
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
72
48
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
53
SLGN is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
GEF-B
SLGN
$188mC
FCF
$343mC
+4.3%C+
Rev
+8.4%B
0.39A-
D/E
2.03C+
30.7xC
P/E
16.6xB+
0.67A-
PEG
0.79A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
GEF-B
SLGN
6% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
40% below
~8%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-6%/yr
-14%
1-yr DCF upside
+57%
-6%
5-yr DCF upside
+66%
+9%
10-yr DCF upside
+80%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
GEF-B
Why this score
  • Raising its dividend
SLGN
Why this score
  • Raising its dividend
GEF-BGreif, Inc.
Packaging & Containers · $111.43 · beta 0.77
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $4.2b. Trading near 52-week high of $113.99 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. PEG 0.67 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Trailing P/E 31x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
SLGNSilgan Holdings Inc.
Packaging & Containers · $42.39 · beta 0.68
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $4.5b. 14% off the 52-week high of $49.55. PEG 0.79 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $55.31 (implying +30% upside).
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 127% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 2.03 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Net margin 4.0% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where GEF-B and SLGN diverge

On the headline score the gap is 4.8 points in favor of SLGN. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.