COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CCK vs GEF-B
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CCK scored 75.4, GEF-B scored 54.3 — CCK leads.
Compare another set
CCK
Crown Holdings, Inc.
75.4
$119.47 · $13.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
21.1
CCK leads
GEF-B
Greif, Inc.
54.3
$111.43 · $4.2B
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestCCK17.2x
- Fastest growthCCK+10.3%
- Strongest balance sheetGEF-B0.39
- Highest qualityCCK77 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueCCK-56%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CCK
stronger →← stronger
GEF-B
77
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
59
75
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
57
74
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
48
CCK is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CCK
GEF-B
$1.2bC+
FCF
$188mC
+10.3%B
Rev
+4.3%C+
1.86C+
D/E
0.39A-
17.2xB+
P/E
30.7xC
0.64A-
PEG
0.67A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CCK
GEF-B
56% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
6% above
~-13%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~8%/yr
+112%
1-yr DCF upside
-14%
+126%
5-yr DCF upside
-6%
+148%
10-yr DCF upside
+9%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CCK
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
GEF-B
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
The companies
CCKCrown Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $13.0b. Trading near 52-week high of $122.91 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +10%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.64 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 14 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $136.57 (implying +14% upside).
Moat
ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 153% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trading within 3% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
GEF-BGreif, Inc.
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $4.2b. Trading near 52-week high of $113.99 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. PEG 0.67 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Trailing P/E 31x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CCK and GEF-B diverge
On the headline score the gap is 21.1 points in favor of CCK. The widest single difference is Value, where CCK leads by 25.7 points.
- ValueCCK 73.9 · GEF-B 48.2CCK +25.7
- GrowthCCK 75.4 · GEF-B 56.5CCK +18.9
- QualityCCK 77.0 · GEF-B 58.9CCK +18.1
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.