Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GE scored 68.0, TDG scored 74.9 — TDG leads.
Compare another set
GE
GE Aerospace
Aerospace & Defense · Quality-Growth
68
$308.20 · $319.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
6.9
TDG leads
TDG
TransDigm Group Incorporated
Aerospace & Defense · Quality-Growth
74.9
$1,107.99 · $61.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestTDG33.6x
Fastest growthGE+18.5%
Highest qualityGE83 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
GE
stronger →← stronger
TDG
83
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
82
72
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
83
53
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
62
TDG is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
GE
TDG
$8.4bB+
FCF
$1.9bC+
+18.5%B+
Rev
+16.6%B+
1.13C+
D/E
Negative equity
36.3xC+
P/E
33.6xC+
3.89D
PEG
3.05D
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
GE
TDG
162% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
54% above
~36%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~22%/yr
-67%
1-yr DCF upside
-45%
-62%
5-yr DCF upside
-35%
-54%
10-yr DCF upside
-17%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
GE
Why this score
Buying back stock
Raising its dividend
Durable high returns
TDG
Why this score
Durable high returns
The companies
GEGE Aerospace
Aerospace & Defense · $308.20 · beta 1.37
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $319.8b. Down 21% from 52-week high of $388.84 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +18%, comfortably above the S&P median. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $394.67 (implying +28% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 48% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. $319.8b market cap places it among the largest companies in the sector — distribution, R&D, and customer-acquisition costs amortize across a base peers can't replicate.
Risk
Trailing P/E 36x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
TDGTransDigm Group Incorporated
Aerospace & Defense · $1,107.99 · beta 0.94
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $61.2b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $1463.03 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +17%, comfortably above the S&P median. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $1,448 (implying +31% upside).
Moat
Net margin 21% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. $61.2b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Trailing P/E 34x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where GE and TDG diverge
On the headline score the gap is 6.9 points in favor of TDG. The widest single difference is Growth, where TDG leads by 11.2 points.
GrowthGE 71.7 · TDG 82.9TDG +11.2
ValueGE 53.0 · TDG 61.8TDG +8.8
QualityGE 82.6 · TDG 82.0level
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is TDG or GE the better stock?
TDG scores higher: TDG 74.9, GE 68.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do TDG and GE differ most?
The widest gap is growth, where TDG leads by 11 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. TDG also leads value, while quality is effectively level between them.
How are TDG and GE scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.