COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026

GDDY vs PLTR

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GDDY scored 85.4, PLTR scored 73.0 — GDDY leads.
Compare another set
GDDY
GoDaddy Inc.
Software - Infrastructure · Quality-Growth
85.4
$100.24 · $12.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
12.4
GDDY leads
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
Software - Infrastructure · Quality-Growth
73
$179.94 · $432.4B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestGDDY14.9x
  • Fastest growthPLTR+78.9%
  • Highest qualityGDDY95 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueGDDY-63%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD85.4/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY95.4GROWTH75.3VALUE86.8
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD73.0/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY83.9GROWTH98.8VALUE47.0
GDDYPLTRQuality95.483.9Growth75.398.8Value86.847.0
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-3%17%+9.9x20x+GDDYoff-scalePLTR

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFGDDY$1.7bPLTR$3.4b
RevGDDY+7.4%PLTR+78.9%
P/EGDDY14.9xPLTR153.8x
PEGGDDY0.68PLTR2.35
GDDY
stronger →← stronger
PLTR
95
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
84
75
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
99
87
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
47
GDDY is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
GDDY
PLTR
$1.7bC+
FCF
$3.4bB
+7.4%B
Rev
+78.9%A
D/E
0.02A
14.9xA-
P/E
153.8xD
0.68A-
PEG
2.35C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
GDDY
PLTR
63% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
700% above
~-14%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
>60%/yr
+135%
1-yr DCF upside
-90%
+172%
5-yr DCF upside
-87%
+238%
10-yr DCF upside
-82%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
GDDY
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
PLTR
Why this score
  • Diluting shareholders
GDDYGoDaddy Inc.
Software - Infrastructure · $100.24 · beta 0.92
Why now
Software - Infrastructure · market cap $12.7b. Down 33% from 52-week high of $150.47 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.68 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 15 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $104.80 (implying +5% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 187% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. Software economics — recurring revenue, embedded customer workflows, and high gross margin all compound the moat once a base account is won. Switching costs are the lever.
Risk
Down 33% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc.
Software - Infrastructure · $179.94 · beta 1.56
Why now
Software - Infrastructure · market cap $432.4b. 13% off the 52-week high of $207.52. Revenue growing +79% — in hypergrowth territory. 27 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $191.68 (implying +7% upside).
Moat
Net margin 49% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 31% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 111% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 153.8x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Beta 1.56 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. P/S 70.2x embeds aggressive forward growth — disappointing top-line guidance would compress the multiple hard.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where GDDY and PLTR diverge

On the headline score the gap is 12.4 points in favor of GDDY. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.