COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
GDDY vs NVDA
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GDDY scored 85.4, NVDA scored 85.9 — NVDA leads.
Compare another set
GDDY
GoDaddy Inc.
85.4
$98.19 · $12.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.5
NVDA leads
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
85.9
$216.85 · $5.3T
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestGDDY14.6x
- Fastest growthNVDA+70.7%
- Highest qualityGDDY95 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueGDDY-64%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
GDDY
stronger →← stronger
NVDA
95
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
88
75
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
99
87
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
73
GDDY is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
GDDY
NVDA
$1.7bC+
FCF
$119.1bA
+7.4%B
Rev
+70.7%A
—
D/E
0.07B+
14.6xA-
P/E
33.2xB
0.68A-
PEG
0.60A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
GDDY
NVDA
64% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
228% above
~-15%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~50%/yr
+140%
1-yr DCF upside
-76%
+178%
5-yr DCF upside
-69%
+245%
10-yr DCF upside
-57%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
GDDY
Why this score
- Buying back stock
NVDA
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
GDDYGoDaddy Inc.
Why now
Software - Infrastructure · market cap $12.4b. Down 35% from 52-week high of $150.47 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.68 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 15 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $104.80 (implying +7% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 187% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. Software economics — recurring revenue, embedded customer workflows, and high gross margin all compound the moat once a base account is won. Switching costs are the lever.
Risk
Down 35% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
NVDANVIDIA Corporation
Why now
Semiconductors · market cap $5.3T. 8% off the 52-week high of $236.54. Revenue growing +71% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.60 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 58 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $304.12 (implying +40% upside).
Moat
Net margin 63% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 82% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. $5.3T market cap places it among the largest companies in the sector — distribution, R&D, and customer-acquisition costs amortize across a base peers can't replicate.
Risk
Beta 2.21 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trailing P/E 33x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. P/S 20.7x embeds aggressive forward growth — disappointing top-line guidance would compress the multiple hard.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
The model slightly favors NVDA (86.2) over GDDY (85.1), driven by NVDA's perfect Growth pillar score of 100 compared to GDDY's 76, reflecting NVDA's +70.7% revenue growth. However, a contrarian might prefer GDDY for its substantial -66% discount to DCF fair value, offering a significant margin of safety versus NVDA's rich +212% valuation.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where GDDY and NVDA diverge
On the headline score the gap is 0.5 points in favor of NVDA. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthGDDY 75.3 · NVDA 99.5NVDA +24.2
- ValueGDDY 86.8 · NVDA 72.6GDDY +14.2
- QualityGDDY 95.4 · NVDA 87.8GDDY +7.6
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.