COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
GDDY vs INOD
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GDDY scored 85.4, INOD scored 86.1 — INOD leads.
Compare another set
GDDY
GoDaddy Inc.
85.4
$100.52 · $12.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.7
INOD leads
INOD
Innodata Inc.
86.1
$57.13 · $2.0B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestGDDY14.9x
- Fastest growthINOD+39.0%
- Highest qualityGDDY95 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueGDDY-63%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
GDDY
stronger →← stronger
INOD
95
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
86
75
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
97
87
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
77
GDDY is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
GDDY
INOD
$1.7bC+
FCF
$184mC
+7.4%B
Rev
+39.0%A
—
D/E
0.02A-
14.9xA-
P/E
44.3xC+
0.68A-
PEG
0.87B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
GDDY
INOD
63% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
54% below
~-14%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-5%/yr
+134%
1-yr DCF upside
+67%
+172%
5-yr DCF upside
+120%
+237%
10-yr DCF upside
+228%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
GDDY
Why this score
- Buying back stock
INOD
Why this score
- Durable high returns
- Diluting shareholders
The companies
GDDYGoDaddy Inc.
Why now
Software - Infrastructure · market cap $12.7b. Down 33% from 52-week high of $150.47 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.68 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 15 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $104.80 (implying +4% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 187% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. Software economics — recurring revenue, embedded customer workflows, and high gross margin all compound the moat once a base account is won. Switching costs are the lever.
Risk
Down 33% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
INODInnodata Inc.
Why now
Information Technology Services · market cap $2.0b. Down 54% from 52-week high of $125.14 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +39% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.87 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 4 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $122.75 (implying +115% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 29% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Down 54% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 2.92 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trailing P/E 44x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
INOD leads GDDY by 0.7 points (86.1 to 85.4), its sharpest advantage coming in Rev (grade A). A contrarian could still prefer GDDY, which trades about 63% below our DCF fair value — a margin of safety the score doesn't reward. Note they play different roles — GDDY screens as value, INOD screens as growth — so the model rewards different traits for each.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where GDDY and INOD diverge
On the headline score the gap is 0.7 points in favor of INOD. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthGDDY 75.3 · INOD 97.5INOD +22.2
- ValueGDDY 86.6 · INOD 76.5GDDY +10.1
- QualityGDDY 95.4 · INOD 85.6GDDY +9.8
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.