COMPARE · Reviewed August 10, 2026
GATX vs LIME
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GATX scored 64.3, LIME scored 71.2 — LIME leads.
Compare another set
GATX
GATX Corporation
64.3
$176.34 · $6.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
6.9
LIME leads
LIME
Neutron Holdings, Inc.
71.2
$40.63 · $2.6B
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
GATX
stronger →← stronger
LIME
51
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
90
85
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
100
61
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
40
LIME is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
GATX
LIME
-$858mF
FCF
—
+22.8%A-
Rev
+29.1%A-
3.48D
D/E
0.20A-
3.0xB
P/S
2.6xB
0.64A-
PEG
—
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Model signals
GATX
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Short track record
LIME
Why this score
- Short track record
The companies
GATXGATX Corporation
Why now
Rental & Leasing Services · market cap $6.2b. 14% off the 52-week high of $205.56. Revenue growing +23%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.64 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 4 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $219.75 (implying +25% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
D/E 3.48 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Free cash flow is negative (-$858m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk.
LIMENeutron Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Rental & Leasing Services · market cap $2.6b. 5% off the 52-week high of $42.68. Revenue growing +29% — in hypergrowth territory. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $39.43 (implying -3% upside).
Moat
Net margin 21% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close.
Risk
Higher-variance name — the thesis leans on growth and valuation rather than a long, settled track record, so it depends on execution continuing. Position size accordingly; a deep drawdown shouldn't change the thesis.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where GATX and LIME diverge
On the headline score the gap is 6.9 points in favour of LIME. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityGATX 51.4 · LIME 90.3LIME +38.9
- ValueGATX 60.8 · LIME 40.0GATX +20.8
- GrowthGATX 85.0 · LIME 100.0LIME +15.0
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.