COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
GAP vs TPR
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GAP scored 59.9, TPR scored 65.7 — TPR leads.
Compare another set
GAP
The Gap, Inc.
59.9
$20.79 · $7.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
5.8
TPR leads
TPR
Tapestry, Inc.
65.7
$131.05 · $26.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestGAP8.4x
- Fastest growthTPR+14.2%
- Strongest balance sheetGAP1.54
- Highest qualityTPR82 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueGAP-32%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
GAP
stronger →← stronger
TPR
76
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
82
36
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
81
77
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
43
TPR is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
GAP
TPR
$1.1bC+
FCF
$1.8bC+
+1.6%C
Rev
+14.2%B+
1.54C+
D/E
5.72D
8.4xA
P/E
18.0xB+
1.14B+
PEG
1.86C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
GAP
TPR
32% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
12% above
~-4%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~11%/yr
+37%
1-yr DCF upside
-19%
+48%
5-yr DCF upside
-11%
+63%
10-yr DCF upside
+3%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
GAP
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
TPR
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
The companies
GAPThe Gap, Inc.
Why now
Apparel Retail · market cap $7.5b. Down 29% from 52-week high of $29.36 — deep drawdown territory. 18 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $25.58 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 117% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Beta 2.05 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
TPRTapestry, Inc.
Why now
Luxury Goods · market cap $26.1b. Down 20% from 52-week high of $164.80 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +14%, comfortably above the S&P median. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $167.40 (implying +28% upside).
Moat
Net margin 19% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 119% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 5.72 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Beta 1.46 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where GAP and TPR diverge
On the headline score the gap is 5.8 points in favor of TPR. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthGAP 36.4 · TPR 81.1TPR +44.7
- ValueGAP 77.2 · TPR 42.7GAP +34.5
- QualityGAP 76.4 · TPR 81.9TPR +5.5
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.