Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. G scored 74.5, LDOS scored 62.6 — G leads.
Compare another set
G
Genpact Limited
Information Technology Services · Quality-Growth
74.5
$34.40 · $5.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
11.9
G leads
LDOS
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
Information Technology Services · Quality-Growth
62.6
$121.68 · $15.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestG10.2x
Fastest growthG+6.6%
Strongest balance sheetG0.54
Highest qualityG80 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueLDOS-67%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
G
stronger →← stronger
LDOS
80
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
77
65
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
46
79
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
69
G is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
G
LDOS
$549mC+
FCF
$2.2bB
+6.6%C+
Rev
+3.4%C+
0.54B
D/E
1.23C
10.2xA
P/E
11.1xA
1.16B+
PEG
2.46C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
G
LDOS
56% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
67% below
~-13%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~-21%/yr
+117%
1-yr DCF upside
+209%
+126%
5-yr DCF upside
+207%
+139%
10-yr DCF upside
+205%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
G
Why this score
Buying back stock
Raising its dividend
Durable high returns
LDOS
Why this score
Buying back stock
Raising its dividend
The companies
GGenpact Limited
Information Technology Services · $34.40 · beta 0.58
Why now
Information Technology Services · market cap $5.8b. Down 29% from 52-week high of $48.64 — deep drawdown territory. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $42.18 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
ROE 22% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
LDOSLeidos Holdings, Inc.
Information Technology Services · $121.68 · beta 0.59
Why now
Information Technology Services · market cap $15.3b. Down 41% from 52-week high of $205.77 — deep drawdown territory. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $152.07 (implying +25% upside).
Moat
ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 157% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Down 41% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where G and LDOS diverge
On the headline score the gap is 11.9 points in favor of G. The widest single difference is Growth, where G leads by 19.4 points.
GrowthG 65.4 · LDOS 46.0G +19.4
ValueG 78.8 · LDOS 69.5G +9.3
QualityG 80.5 · LDOS 76.9G +3.6
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is G or LDOS the better stock?
G scores higher: G 74.5, LDOS 62.6 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do G and LDOS differ most?
The widest gap is growth, where G leads by 19 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. G leads all three pillars, so the gap is broad rather than a single-measure difference.
How are G and LDOS scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.