COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
G vs INOD
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. G scored 76.1, INOD scored 79.8 — INOD leads.
Compare another set
G
Genpact Limited
76.1
$37.14 · $6.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
3.7
INOD leads
INOD
Innodata Inc.
79.8
$64.21 · $2.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestG11.1x
- Fastest growthINOD+39.0%
- Strongest balance sheetINOD0.02
- Highest qualityINOD86 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueG-57%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
G
stronger →← stronger
INOD
80
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
86
73
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
97
76
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
61
INOD is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
G
INOD
$572mC+
FCF
$184mC
+6.5%C+
Rev
+39.0%A
0.54C+
D/E
0.02A-
11.1xA
P/E
49.8xC+
1.16B+
PEG
0.87B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
G
INOD
57% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
49% below
~-13%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-2%/yr
+115%
1-yr DCF upside
+49%
+135%
5-yr DCF upside
+96%
+168%
10-yr DCF upside
+192%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
G
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
INOD
Why this score
- Durable high returns
- Diluting shareholders
The companies
GGenpact Limited
Why now
Information Technology Services · market cap $6.2b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $48.64 — deep drawdown territory. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $42.18 (implying +14% upside).
Moat
ROE 22% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 98% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
INODInnodata Inc.
Why now
Information Technology Services · market cap $2.2b. Down 49% from 52-week high of $125.14 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +39% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.87 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 4 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $122.75 (implying +91% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 29% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Down 49% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 2.92 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trailing P/E 50x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where G and INOD diverge
On the headline score the gap is 3.7 points in favor of INOD. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthG 72.7 · INOD 97.5INOD +24.8
- ValueG 75.7 · INOD 60.8G +14.9
- QualityG 80.2 · INOD 85.5INOD +5.3
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.