COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
EXLS vs G
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. EXLS scored 81.8, G scored 76.1 — EXLS leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. G's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but EXLS's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
EXLS
ExlService Holdings, Inc.
81.8
$37.53 · $5.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
5.7
EXLS leads
G
Genpact Limited
76.1
$37.14 · $6.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestG11.1x
- Fastest growthEXLS+13.4%
- Strongest balance sheetG0.54
- Highest qualityEXLS85 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueG-57%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
EXLS
stronger →← stronger
G
85
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
80
88
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
73
73
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
76
EXLS is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
EXLS
G
$297mC
FCF
$572mC+
+13.4%B+
Rev
+6.5%C+
0.57C+
D/E
0.54C+
23.8xB+
P/E
11.1xA
1.10B+
PEG
1.16B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
EXLS
G
13% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
57% below
~5%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-13%/yr
+1%
1-yr DCF upside
+115%
+15%
5-yr DCF upside
+135%
+41%
10-yr DCF upside
+168%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
EXLS
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
G
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
EXLSExlService Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Information Technology Services · market cap $5.7b. 17% off the 52-week high of $45.08. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $44.38 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
ROE 32% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 118% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
GGenpact Limited
Why now
Information Technology Services · market cap $6.2b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $48.64 — deep drawdown territory. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $42.18 (implying +14% upside).
Moat
ROE 22% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 98% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
EXLS leads G by 8 points (83.7 to 75.7), its sharpest advantage coming in Rev (grade B+). A contrarian could still prefer G, which trades about 65% below our DCF fair value — a margin of safety the score doesn't reward. Note they play different roles — EXLS screens as growth, G screens as value — so the model rewards different traits for each.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where EXLS and G diverge
On the headline score the gap is 5.7 points in favor of EXLS. The widest single difference is Growth, where EXLS leads by 15.5 points.
- GrowthEXLS 88.2 · G 72.7EXLS +15.5
- QualityEXLS 85.0 · G 80.2EXLS +4.8
- ValueEXLS 72.9 · G 75.7level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.