COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CTSH vs G
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CTSH scored 76.8, G scored 76.1 — CTSH leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. G's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but CTSH's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
CTSH
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
76.8
$61.87 · $27.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.7
CTSH leads
G
Genpact Limited
76.1
$37.14 · $6.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestG11.1x
- Fastest growthCTSH+6.5%
- Strongest balance sheetCTSH0.14
- Highest qualityCTSH81 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueG-57%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CTSH
stronger →← stronger
G
81
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
80
70
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
73
81
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
76
CTSH and G split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CTSH
G
$2.5bB
FCF
$572mC+
+6.5%C+
Rev
+6.5%C+
0.14B+
D/E
0.54C+
13.3xA
P/E
11.1xA
0.97B+
PEG
1.16B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CTSH
G
44% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
57% below
~-7%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-13%/yr
+64%
1-yr DCF upside
+115%
+80%
5-yr DCF upside
+135%
+106%
10-yr DCF upside
+168%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CTSH
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
G
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
CTSHCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
Why now
Information Technology Services · market cap $27.9b. Down 29% from 52-week high of $87.03 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.97 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 25 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $63.94 (implying +3% upside).
Moat
ROE 15% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 111% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
GGenpact Limited
Why now
Information Technology Services · market cap $6.2b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $48.64 — deep drawdown territory. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $42.18 (implying +14% upside).
Moat
ROE 22% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 98% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
The model favors CTSH (78.1) over G (75.7) primarily due to CTSH's superior Value pillar score of 85 compared to G's 76. However, a contrarian might prefer G, which implies a lower annual growth of -17% over ten years compared to CTSH's -8%, suggesting less optimism is priced into G's current valuation.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CTSH and G diverge
On the headline score the gap is 0.7 points in favor of CTSH. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueCTSH 80.7 · G 75.7CTSH +5.0
- GrowthCTSH 69.6 · G 72.7G +3.1
- QualityCTSH 80.6 · G 80.2level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.