COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
BR vs G
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BR scored 71.6, G scored 76.1 — G leads.
Compare another set
BR
Broadridge Financial Solutions,
71.6
$182.18 · $20.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
4.5
G leads
G
Genpact Limited
76.1
$37.14 · $6.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestG11.1x
- Fastest growthBR+8.5%
- Strongest balance sheetG0.54
- Highest qualityBR81 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueG-57%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BR
stronger →← stronger
G
81
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
80
77
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
73
59
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
76
BR is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BR
G
$1.3bC+
FCF
$572mC+
+8.5%B
Rev
+6.5%C+
1.24C
D/E
0.54C+
19.0xA-
P/E
11.1xA
1.91C+
PEG
1.16B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BR
G
13% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
57% below
~3%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-13%/yr
+6%
1-yr DCF upside
+115%
+15%
5-yr DCF upside
+135%
+31%
10-yr DCF upside
+168%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BR
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
G
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
BRBroadridge Financial Solutions,
Why now
Information Technology Services · market cap $20.8b. Down 31% from 52-week high of $263.00 — deep drawdown territory. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $213.25 (implying +17% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 40% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 114% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 31% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
GGenpact Limited
Why now
Information Technology Services · market cap $6.2b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $48.64 — deep drawdown territory. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $42.18 (implying +14% upside).
Moat
ROE 22% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 98% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
BR leads G by 1.8 points (77.5 to 75.7), its sharpest advantage coming in Rev (grade B). A contrarian could still prefer G, which trades about 65% below our DCF fair value — a margin of safety the score doesn't reward. Note they play different roles — BR screens as growth, G screens as value — so the model rewards different traits for each.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BR and G diverge
On the headline score the gap is 4.5 points in favor of G. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueBR 59.0 · G 75.7G +16.7
- GrowthBR 76.6 · G 72.7BR +3.9
- QualityBR 81.4 · G 80.2level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.