COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
FUTU vs VIRT
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FUTU scored 81.0, VIRT scored 78.0 — FUTU leads.
Compare another set
FUTU
Futu Holdings Limited
67.4Fin
$123.64 · $17.3B
Strength gap
1.7
FUTU leads
VIRT
Virtu Financial, Inc.
65.7Fin
$67.93 · $6.0B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestVIRT11.3x
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FUTU
VIRT
—
Rev
+26.2%A-
12.3xB+
P/E
11.3xB+
27.8%A-
ROE
53.6%A
3.01C
P/B
3.07C
2.4%B
Yield
1.6%C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
FUTUFutu Holdings Limited
Why now
Capital Markets · market cap $17.3b. Down 39% from 52-week high of $202.53 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.36 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 18 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $155.90 (implying +26% upside).
Moat
Net margin 45% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 28% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. Financial moat — scale of deposit base / underwriting franchise plus regulatory capital advantages. The largest players compound book value through cycles that erase smaller competitors.
Risk
Down 39% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Duration mismatch — the asset and liability books reprice on different schedules; a rapid move in rates either direction can compress net interest margin before management can reposition.
VIRTVirtu Financial, Inc.
Why now
Capital Markets · market cap $6.0b. Trading near 52-week high of $68.68 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. 7 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $66.71 (implying -2% upside).
Moat
Net margin 17% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 54% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. Financial moat — scale of deposit base / underwriting franchise plus regulatory capital advantages. The largest players compound book value through cycles that erase smaller competitors.
Risk
D/E 4.15 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Trading within 1% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.