Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FUTU scored 80.0, ETOR scored 83.0 — ETOR leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. ETOR's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but FUTU's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
FUTU
Futu Holdings Limited
Capital Markets · Financial strength
67.9Fin
$113.71 · $15.9B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
1.6
FUTU leads
ETOR
eToro Group Ltd.
Capital Markets · Financial strength
66.3Fin
$25.90 · $2.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestETOR9.6x
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FUTU
ETOR
—
Rev
+9.4%B
11.3xB+
P/E
9.6xA-
30.5%A
ROE
19.5%B+
3.18C
P/B
1.55B
2.4%B
Yield
0.0%C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
FUTUFutu Holdings Limited
Capital Markets · $113.71 · beta 0.44
Why now
Capital Markets · market cap $15.9b. Down 44% from 52-week high of $202.53 — deep drawdown territory. 18 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $160.85 (implying +41% upside).
Moat
Net margin 46% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 31% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. Financial moat — scale of deposit base / underwriting franchise plus regulatory capital advantages. The largest players compound book value through cycles that erase smaller competitors.
Risk
Down 44% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Duration mismatch — the asset and liability books reprice on different schedules; a rapid move in rates either direction can compress net interest margin before management can reposition.
ETOReToro Group Ltd.
Capital Markets · $25.90
Why now
Capital Markets · market cap $2.1b. Down 41% from 52-week high of $44.21 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.43 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $46.80 (implying +81% upside).
Moat
ROE 19% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Financial moat — scale of deposit base / underwriting franchise plus regulatory capital advantages. The largest players compound book value through cycles that erase smaller competitors.
Risk
Down 41% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 2.2% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. Regulatory capital risk — stricter capital requirements (CCAR, Basel) can force a dividend cut or a capital raise; the largest banks are most exposed because they're held to the tightest standards.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Common questions
Is ETOR or FUTU the better stock?
ETOR scores higher: ETOR 83.0, FUTU 80.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
How are ETOR and FUTU scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.