COMPARE · Reviewed July 29, 2026

FTI vs INVX

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FTI scored 59.9, INVX scored 54.4 — FTI leads.
Compare another set
FTI
TechnipFMC PLC
Energy · Quality-Growth
59.9
$69.12 · $28.0B
Score gap
5.5
FTI leads
INVX
Innovex International, Inc.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services · Quality-Growth
54.4
$26.61 · $1.9B
fundamentals as of
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD60/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY90GROWTH69VALUE35
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD54/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY59GROWTH50VALUE55
FTI
stronger →← stronger
INVX
90
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
59
69
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
35
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
55
FTI is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
FTI
INVX
$1.3bC+
FCF
$152mC
+9.9%B
Rev
+26.3%A-
0.13A-
D/E
0.07A
26.6xC+
P/E
35.5xC
2.69C
PEG
0.71A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
FTI
INVX
4% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
48% below
~6%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-1%/yr
-5%
1-yr DCF upside
+46%
+4%
5-yr DCF upside
+92%
+19%
10-yr DCF upside
+187%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
FTI
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
INVX
Why this score
  • Cyclical growth
FTITechnipFMC PLC
Energy · $69.12 · beta 0.74
Why now
Energy · market cap $28.0b. 11% off the 52-week high of $77.92.
Moat
ROE 33% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Reserve-replacement treadmill — every barrel or ounce extracted has to be replaced through exploration or acquisition; underspending on replacement reserves shows up in production declines 2-3 years out.
INVXInnovex International, Inc.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services · $26.61
Why now
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services · market cap $1.9b. 18% off the 52-week high of $32.25. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.71 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 5 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $33.00 (implying +24% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Trailing P/E 35x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. ROE 5% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate. Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.