COMPARE · Reviewed July 29, 2026
FTI vs HAL
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FTI scored 59.9, HAL scored 57.4 — FTI leads.
Compare another set
FTI
TechnipFMC PLC
59.9
$69.12 · $28.0B
Score gap
2.5
FTI leads
HAL
Halliburton Company
57.4
$31.63 · $26.4B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FTI
stronger →← stronger
HAL
90
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
67
69
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
35
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
57
FTI is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FTI
HAL
$1.3bC+
FCF
$1.7bC+
+9.9%B
Rev
+0.6%C
0.13A-
D/E
0.74B
26.6xC+
P/E
16.6xB
2.69C
PEG
0.79A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
FTI
HAL
4% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
48% below
~6%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-2%/yr
-5%
1-yr DCF upside
+47%
+4%
5-yr DCF upside
+92%
+19%
10-yr DCF upside
+186%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
FTI
Why this score
- Buying back stock
HAL
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cyclical growth
The companies
FTITechnipFMC PLC
Why now
Energy · market cap $28.0b. 11% off the 52-week high of $77.92.
Moat
ROE 33% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Reserve-replacement treadmill — every barrel or ounce extracted has to be replaced through exploration or acquisition; underspending on replacement reserves shows up in production declines 2-3 years out.
HALHalliburton Company
Why now
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services · market cap $26.4b. Down 27% from 52-week high of $43.59 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.79 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 25 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $43.52 (implying +38% upside).
Moat
ROE 15% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 108% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Commodity exposure — earnings power tracks the price of the underlying commodity, not management execution. A 15-20% move in the commodity reprices the equity well before fundamentals catch up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.