COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
EFXT vs FTI
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. EFXT scored 60.9, FTI scored 54.8 — EFXT leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. FTI's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but EFXT's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
EFXT
Enerflex Ltd.
60.9
$20.34 · $2.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
6.1
EFXT leads
FTI
TechnipFMC plc
54.8
$77.45 · $30.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestFTI27.1x
- Fastest growthFTI+9.9%
- Strongest balance sheetFTI0.38
- Highest qualityFTI87 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueEFXT-43%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
EFXT
stronger →← stronger
FTI
67
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
87
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
67
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
38
EFXT and FTI split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
EFXT
FTI
$326mC
FCF
$1.6bC+
+6.5%C+
Rev
+9.9%B
0.51B
D/E
0.38B+
46.2xC
P/E
27.1xC+
1.17B+
PEG
2.18C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
EFXT
FTI
43% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
21% below
~0%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~4%/yr
+37%
1-yr DCF upside
+7%
+77%
5-yr DCF upside
+26%
+150%
10-yr DCF upside
+60%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
EFXT
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Cyclical growth
FTI
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cyclical growth
The companies
EFXTEnerflex Ltd.
Why now
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services · market cap $2.5b. Down 30% from 52-week high of $29.15 — deep drawdown territory.
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Down 30% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 2.08 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trailing P/E 46x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
FTITechnipFMC plc
Why now
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services · market cap $30.4b. 4% off the 52-week high of $80.55. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $75.81 (implying -2% upside).
Moat
ROE 36% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 134% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Reserve-replacement treadmill — every barrel or ounce extracted has to be replaced through exploration or acquisition; underspending on replacement reserves shows up in production declines 2-3 years out.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where EFXT and FTI diverge
On the headline score the gap is 6.1 points in favor of EFXT. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueEFXT 67.3 · FTI 37.7EFXT +29.6
- QualityEFXT 67.1 · FTI 87.3FTI +20.2
- GrowthEFXT 50.0 · FTI 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.