COMPARE · Data as of August 14, 2026
FTAI vs MDA
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FTAI scored 68.0, MDA scored 49.3 — FTAI leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. FTAI's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but MDA's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
FTAI
FTAI Aviation Ltd.
68
$217.13 · $22.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
18.7
FTAI leads
MDA
MDA Space Ltd.
49.3
$35.21 · $5.7B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FTAI
stronger →← stronger
MDA
47
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
23
97
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
98
69
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
63
FTAI is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FTAI
MDA
-$890mF
FCF
-$72mF
+45.3%A
Rev
+51.2%A
8.65D
D/E
—
7.2xC
P/S
3.8xC+
0.43A
PEG
0.87B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Model signals
FTAI
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Short track record
MDA
Why this score
- Short track record
- Foreign reporter (CAD)
The companies
FTAIFTAI Aviation Ltd.
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $22.3b. Down 33% from 52-week high of $323.51 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +45% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.43 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $364.00 (implying +68% upside).
Moat
Net margin 16% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent.
Risk
D/E 8.65 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Free cash flow is negative (-$890m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Down 33% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
MDAMDA Space Ltd.
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $5.7b. Down 29% from 52-week high of $49.37 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +51% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.87 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $44.29 (implying +26% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$72m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Trailing P/E 61.8x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Net margin 2.2% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where FTAI and MDA diverge
On the headline score the gap is 18.7 points in favor of FTAI. The widest single difference is Quality, where FTAI leads by 24.4 points.
- QualityFTAI 47.0 · MDA 22.6FTAI +24.4
- ValueFTAI 68.7 · MDA 63.3FTAI +5.4
- GrowthFTAI 97.4 · MDA 97.8level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.