Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FTAI scored 69.4, LHX scored 47.0 — FTAI leads.
Compare another set
FTAI
FTAI Aviation Ltd.
Aerospace & Defense · Quality-Growth
69.4
$169.97 · $17.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
22.4
FTAI leads
LHX
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
Aerospace & Defense · Quality-Growth
47
$236.97 · $44.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthFTAI+45.3%
Strongest balance sheetLHX0.53
Highest qualityLHX61 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueLHX-45%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FTAI
stronger →← stronger
LHX
55
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
61
98
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
62
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
34
FTAI is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FTAI
LHX
-$890mF
FCF
$2.8bB
+45.3%A
Rev
+2.5%C
8.65D
D/E
0.53B
5.6xC
P/S
—
0.28A
PEG
1.18B+
—
P/E
23.9xB+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
FTAI
LHX
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
45% below
—
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~-6%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
+65%
—
5-yr DCF upside
+80%
—
10-yr DCF upside
+107%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
FTAI
Why this score
Raising its dividend
LHX
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
FTAIFTAI Aviation Ltd.
Aerospace & Defense · $169.97 · beta 1.57
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $17.5b. Down 47% from 52-week high of $323.51 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +45% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.28 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $355.60 (implying +109% upside).
Moat
Net margin 16% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent.
Risk
D/E 8.65 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Free cash flow is negative (-$890m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Down 47% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
LHXL3Harris Technologies, Inc.
Aerospace & Defense · $236.97 · beta 0.51
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $44.1b. Down 38% from 52-week high of $379.23 — deep drawdown territory. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $325.18 (implying +37% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 151% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Down 38% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where FTAI and LHX diverge
On the headline score the gap is 22.4 points in favor of FTAI. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
GrowthFTAI 98.3 · LHX 50.5FTAI +47.8
ValueFTAI 61.9 · LHX 34.1FTAI +27.8
QualityFTAI 55.0 · LHX 60.5LHX +5.5
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is FTAI or LHX the better stock?
FTAI scores higher: FTAI 69.4, LHX 47.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do FTAI and LHX differ most?
The widest gap is growth, where FTAI leads by 48 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are FTAI and LHX scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.