COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
FRVO vs WEC
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FRVO scored 35.3, WEC scored 62.0 — WEC leads.
Compare another set
FRVO
Fervo Energy Company
35.3
$15.47 · $4.6B
Score gap
26.7
WEC leads
WEC
WEC Energy Group, Inc.
62
$107.58 · $35.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthWEC+8.9%
- Strongest balance sheetFRVO0.11
- Highest qualityFRVO74 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FRVO
stronger →← stronger
WEC
74
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
59
15
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
71
40
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
57
WEC is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FRVO
WEC
—
FCF
$877mC+
-30.7%F
Rev
+8.9%B
0.11A
D/E
1.58B
—
PEG
2.23C
—
P/E
20.9xB
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
FRVO
WEC
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
147% above
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~28%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-62%
—
5-yr DCF upside
-60%
—
10-yr DCF upside
-56%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
FRVO
Why this score
- Short track record
WEC
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
The companies
FRVOFervo Energy Company
Why now
Utilities - Renewable · market cap $4.6b. Down 64% from 52-week high of $42.65 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -31% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $42.82 (implying +177% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
Revenue contracting -31% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Down 64% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
WECWEC Energy Group, Inc.
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap $35.1b. 10% off the 52-week high of $119.91. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $121.79 (implying +13% upside).
Moat
Net margin 17% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where FRVO and WEC diverge
On the headline score the gap is 26.7 points in favor of WEC. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthFRVO 15.0 · WEC 70.8WEC +55.8
- ValueFRVO 40.0 · WEC 57.4WEC +17.4
- QualityFRVO 73.6 · WEC 58.5FRVO +15.1
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.