COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
FRVO vs MWH
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FRVO scored 35.3, MWH scored 72.0 — MWH leads.
Compare another set
FRVO
Fervo Energy Company
35.3
$15.47 · $4.6B
Score gap
36.7
MWH leads
MWH
SOLV Energy, Inc.
72
$28.04 · $5.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthMWH+34.8%
- Strongest balance sheetMWH0.10
- Highest qualityMWH75 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueMWH-34%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FRVO
stronger →← stronger
MWH
74
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
75
15
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
95
40
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
87
MWH is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FRVO
MWH
—
FCF
$368mC
-30.7%F
Rev
+34.8%A
0.11A
D/E
0.10A
—
PEG
1.13B+
—
P/E
47.5xD
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
FRVO
MWH
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
34% below
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~4%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
+16%
—
5-yr DCF upside
+52%
—
10-yr DCF upside
+127%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
FRVO
Why this score
- Short track record
MWH
Why this score
- Short track record
The companies
FRVOFervo Energy Company
Why now
Utilities - Renewable · market cap $4.6b. Down 64% from 52-week high of $42.65 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -31% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $42.82 (implying +177% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
Revenue contracting -31% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Down 64% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
MWHSOLV Energy, Inc.
Why now
Utilities - Renewable · market cap $5.7b. Down 42% from 52-week high of $48.40 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +35% — in hypergrowth territory. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $45.18 (implying +61% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Down 42% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Trailing P/E 48x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. Net margin 3.8% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
MWH leads FRVO by 36.7 points (72.0 to 35.3), its sharpest advantage coming in Rev (grade A). Note they play different roles — FRVO screens as spec, MWH screens as growth — so the model rewards different traits for each.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where FRVO and MWH diverge
On the headline score the gap is 36.7 points in favor of MWH. The widest single difference is Growth, where MWH leads by 80.2 points.
- GrowthFRVO 15.0 · MWH 95.2MWH +80.2
- ValueFRVO 40.0 · MWH 86.6MWH +46.6
- QualityFRVO 73.6 · MWH 74.9level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.