COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026

FRSH vs INTU

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FRSH scored 73.8, INTU scored 85.0 — INTU leads.
Compare another set
FRSH
Freshworks Inc.
Software - Application · Quality-Growth
73.8
$12.98 · $3.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
11.2
INTU leads
INTU
Intuit Inc.
Software - Application · Quality-Growth
85
$367.00 · $100.4B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestFRSH20.6x
  • Fastest growthFRSH+15.6%
  • Strongest balance sheetFRSH0.04
  • Highest qualityINTU86 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueFRSH-44%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD73.8/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY65.3GROWTH90.0VALUE68.4
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD85.0/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY85.6GROWTH89.6VALUE80.1
FRSHINTUQuality65.385.6Growth90.089.6Value68.480.1
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)5%26%16x27xFRSHINTU

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFFRSH$234mINTU$7.8b
RevFRSH+15.6%INTU+15.1%
D/EFRSH0.04INTU0.33
P/EFRSH20.6xINTU22.4x
PEGFRSH0.66INTU0.94
FRSH
stronger →← stronger
INTU
65
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
86
90
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
90
68
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
80
INTU is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
FRSH
INTU
$234mC
FCF
$7.8bB+
+15.6%B+
Rev
+15.1%B+
0.04A-
D/E
0.33B
20.6xB+
P/E
22.4xB+
0.66A-
PEG
0.94B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
FRSH
INTU
44% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
34% below
~0%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-1%/yr
+37%
1-yr DCF upside
+31%
+80%
5-yr DCF upside
+51%
+168%
10-yr DCF upside
+87%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
FRSH
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
INTU
Why this score
  • Raising its dividend
FRSHFreshworks Inc.
Software - Application · $12.98 · beta 0.86
Why now
Software - Application · market cap $3.4b. 7% off the 52-week high of $13.96. Revenue growing +16%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.66 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $14.38 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
Net margin 20% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 21% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 126% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
INTUIntuit Inc.
Software - Application · $367.00 · beta 0.96
Why now
Software - Application · market cap $100.4b. Down 48% from 52-week high of $705.08 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +15%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.94 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 33 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $446.02 (implying +22% upside).
Moat
Net margin 22% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 22% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 169% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 48% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where FRSH and INTU diverge

On the headline score the gap is 11.2 points in favor of INTU. The widest single difference is Quality, where INTU leads by 20.3 points.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.