COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
FRPT vs JBS
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FRPT scored 32.6, JBS scored 72.0 — JBS leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. FRPT's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but JBS's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
FRPT
Freshpet, Inc.
32.6
$73.97 · $3.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
39.4
JBS leads
JBS
JBS N.V.
72
$13.82 · $14.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestJBS12.9x
- Fastest growthFRPT+12.8%
- Strongest balance sheetFRPT0.40
- Highest qualityJBS69 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueJBS-24%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FRPT
stronger →← stronger
JBS
60
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
69
56
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
69
10
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
87
JBS is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FRPT
JBS
$61mC-
FCF
$833mC+
+12.8%B+
Rev
+11.7%B
0.40B+
D/E
2.83D
19.2xB
P/E
12.9xA-
4.19D
PEG
0.44A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
FRPT
JBS
277% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
24% below
~53%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~8%/yr
-80%
1-yr DCF upside
+0%
-73%
5-yr DCF upside
+32%
-62%
10-yr DCF upside
+97%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
FRPT
No notable signals flagged.
JBS
Why this score
- Short track record
The companies
FRPTFreshpet, Inc.
Why now
Packaged Foods · market cap $3.6b. 14% off the 52-week high of $86.00. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $84.25 (implying +14% upside).
Moat
Net margin 17% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 16% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Beta 1.64 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
JBSJBS N.V.
Why now
Packaged Foods · market cap $14.8b. Down 26% from 52-week high of $18.65 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.44 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $18.03 (implying +30% upside).
Moat
ROE 23% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
D/E 2.83 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Dividend payout 93% of earnings on a 9.8% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. Net margin 2.6% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where FRPT and JBS diverge
On the headline score the gap is 39.4 points in favor of JBS. The widest single difference is Value, where JBS leads by 76.5 points.
- ValueFRPT 10.5 · JBS 87.0JBS +76.5
- GrowthFRPT 55.6 · JBS 69.0JBS +13.4
- QualityFRPT 59.6 · JBS 69.3JBS +9.7
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.