COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
FMX vs POST
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FMX scored 24.4, POST scored 65.8 — POST leads.
Compare another set
FMX
Fomento Económico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V.
24.4
$120.68 · $41.1B
Score gap
41.4
POST leads
POST
Post Holdings, Inc.
65.8
$80.50 · $3.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestPOST14.6x
- Fastest growthFMX+11.2%
- Strongest balance sheetFMX0.84
- Highest qualityFMX62 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valuePOST-46%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FMX
stronger →← stronger
POST
62
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
52
64
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
72
5
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
76
POST is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FMX
POST
—
FCF
$553mC+
+11.2%B
Rev
+6.2%C+
0.84B
D/E
2.47D
23.4xB
P/E
14.6xA-
4.72D
PEG
1.17B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
FMX
POST
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
46% below
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-16%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
+106%
—
5-yr DCF upside
+85%
—
10-yr DCF upside
+60%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
FMX
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Foreign reporter (MXN)
POST
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
FMXFomento Económico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V.
Why now
Beverages - Brewers · market cap $41.1b. 15% off the 52-week high of $141.47. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $134.54 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Dividend payout 139% of earnings on a 5.0% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
POSTPost Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Packaged Foods · market cap $3.6b. Down 31% from 52-week high of $117.28 — deep drawdown territory. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $105.17 (implying +31% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 189% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 2.47 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Down 31% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 3.5% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where FMX and POST diverge
On the headline score the gap is 41.4 points in favor of POST. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueFMX 5.1 · POST 75.6POST +70.5
- QualityFMX 61.9 · POST 52.5FMX +9.4
- GrowthFMX 63.8 · POST 71.7POST +7.9
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.