COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
FMX vs JBS
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FMX scored 24.4, JBS scored 72.0 — JBS leads.
Compare another set
FMX
Fomento Económico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V.
24.4
$120.68 · $41.1B
Score gap
47.6
JBS leads
JBS
JBS N.V.
72
$13.82 · $14.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestJBS12.9x
- Fastest growthJBS+11.7%
- Strongest balance sheetFMX0.84
- Highest qualityJBS69 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueJBS-24%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FMX
stronger →← stronger
JBS
62
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
69
64
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
69
5
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
87
JBS is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FMX
JBS
—
FCF
$833mC+
+11.2%B
Rev
+11.7%B
0.84B
D/E
2.83D
23.4xB
P/E
12.9xA-
4.72D
PEG
0.44A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
FMX
JBS
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
24% below
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~8%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
+0%
—
5-yr DCF upside
+32%
—
10-yr DCF upside
+97%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
FMX
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Foreign reporter (MXN)
JBS
Why this score
- Short track record
The companies
FMXFomento Económico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V.
Why now
Beverages - Brewers · market cap $41.1b. 15% off the 52-week high of $141.47. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $134.54 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Dividend payout 139% of earnings on a 5.0% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
JBSJBS N.V.
Why now
Packaged Foods · market cap $14.8b. Down 26% from 52-week high of $18.65 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.44 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $18.03 (implying +30% upside).
Moat
ROE 23% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
D/E 2.83 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Dividend payout 93% of earnings on a 9.8% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. Net margin 2.6% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where FMX and JBS diverge
On the headline score the gap is 47.6 points in favor of JBS. The widest single difference is Value, where JBS leads by 81.9 points.
- ValueFMX 5.1 · JBS 87.0JBS +81.9
- QualityFMX 61.9 · JBS 69.3JBS +7.4
- GrowthFMX 63.8 · JBS 69.0JBS +5.2
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.