COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
COCO vs FMX
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. COCO scored 65.3, FMX scored 24.4 — COCO leads.
Compare another set
COCO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc.
65.3
$63.35 · $3.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
40.9
COCO leads
FMX
Fomento Económico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V.
24.4
$120.68 · $41.1B
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestFMX23.4x
- Fastest growthCOCO+26.1%
- Strongest balance sheetCOCO0.04
- Highest qualityCOCO85 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
COCO
stronger →← stronger
FMX
85
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
62
93
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
64
35
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
5
COCO is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
COCO
FMX
$124mC
FCF
—
+26.1%A-
Rev
+11.2%B
0.04A
D/E
0.84B
35.0xC
P/E
23.4xB
2.36C
PEG
4.72D
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
COCO
FMX
25% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~15%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
-32%
1-yr DCF upside
—
-20%
5-yr DCF upside
—
+1%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
COCO
Why this score
- Durable high returns
FMX
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Foreign reporter (MXN)
The companies
COCOThe Vita Coco Company, Inc.
Why now
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic · market cap $3.7b. Down 26% from 52-week high of $85.83 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. 9 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $83.89 (implying +32% upside).
Moat
Net margin 16% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 28% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 112% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 35x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
FMXFomento Económico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V.
Why now
Beverages - Brewers · market cap $41.1b. 15% off the 52-week high of $141.47. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $134.54 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Dividend payout 139% of earnings on a 5.0% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where COCO and FMX diverge
On the headline score the gap is 40.9 points in favor of COCO. The widest single difference is Value, where COCO leads by 30.3 points.
- ValueCOCO 35.4 · FMX 5.1COCO +30.3
- GrowthCOCO 93.0 · FMX 63.8COCO +29.2
- QualityCOCO 84.7 · FMX 61.9COCO +22.8
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.