COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
FLUT vs MLCO
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FLUT scored 50.3, MLCO scored 66.2 — MLCO leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. FLUT's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but MLCO's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
FLUT
Flutter Entertainment plc
50.3
$102.61 · $17.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
15.9
MLCO leads
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited
66.2
$5.49 · $2.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthFLUT+15.2%
- Highest qualityMLCO64 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueMLCO-93%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FLUT
stronger →← stronger
MLCO
28
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
64
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
90
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
91
MLCO is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FLUT
MLCO
$1.2bC+
FCF
$809mC+
+15.2%B+
Rev
+11.3%B
1.34C+
D/E
—
1.0xB+
P/S
—
0.19A
PEG
0.59A-
—
P/E
9.3xA
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
FLUT
MLCO
35% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
93% below
~4%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
decline
+17%
1-yr DCF upside
+919%
+54%
5-yr DCF upside
+1252%
+129%
10-yr DCF upside
+1978%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
FLUT
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
MLCO
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cyclical growth
The companies
FLUTFlutter Entertainment plc
Why now
Gambling · market cap $17.8b. Down 67% from 52-week high of $309.41 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +15%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.19 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 30 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $141.97 (implying +38% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -5.0%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 67% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. ROE -10% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
MLCOMelco Resorts & Entertainment Limited
Why now
Resorts & Casinos · market cap $2.1b. Down 46% from 52-week high of $10.15 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.59 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $7.35 (implying +34% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Down 46% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 3.6% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE -15% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where FLUT and MLCO diverge
On the headline score the gap is 15.9 points in favor of MLCO. The widest single difference is Quality, where MLCO leads by 35.5 points.
- QualityFLUT 28.5 · MLCO 64.0MLCO +35.5
- ValueFLUT 89.7 · MLCO 90.6level
- GrowthFLUT 50.0 · MLCO 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.