COMPARE · Data as of August 12, 2026
FLR vs WMS
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FLR scored 27.9, WMS scored 73.2 — WMS leads.
Compare another set
FLR
Fluor Corporation
27.9
$52.03 · $7.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
45.3
WMS leads
WMS
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
73.2
$140.53 · $10.6B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FLR
stronger →← stronger
WMS
28
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
81
14
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
80
55
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
60
WMS is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FLR
WMS
-$330mF
FCF
$550mC+
-4.8%D+
Rev
+10.4%B
0.38B+
D/E
0.97C+
0.4xA
P/S
—
1.10B+
PEG
1.34B
—
P/E
24.4xB+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
FLR
WMS
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
19% above
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~15%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-29%
—
5-yr DCF upside
-16%
—
10-yr DCF upside
+8%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
FLR
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Earnings outpace cash
WMS
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
FLRFluor Corporation
Why now
Engineering & Construction · market cap $7.0b. 10% off the 52-week high of $57.93. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $60.69 (implying +17% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$330m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Currently unprofitable (margin -12.8%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. ROE -74% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
WMSAdvanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
Why now
Building Products & Equipment · market cap $10.6b. Down 22% from 52-week high of $179.31 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +10%, comfortably above the S&P median. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $183.36 (implying +30% upside).
Moat
Net margin 14% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 25% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 121% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where FLR and WMS diverge
On the headline score the gap is 45.3 points in favour of WMS. The widest single difference is Growth, where WMS leads by 66.0 points.
- GrowthFLR 14.1 · WMS 80.1WMS +66.0
- QualityFLR 27.9 · WMS 80.9WMS +53.0
- ValueFLR 55.3 · WMS 60.4WMS +5.1
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.