COMPARE · Data as of August 12, 2026
FLR vs TREX
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FLR scored 27.9, TREX scored 72.7 — TREX leads.
Compare another set
FLR
Fluor Corporation
27.9
$52.03 · $7.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
44.8
TREX leads
TREX
Trex Company, Inc.
72.7
$49.53 · $5.0B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FLR
stronger →← stronger
TREX
28
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
88
14
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
68
55
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
64
TREX is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FLR
TREX
-$330mF
FCF
$208mC
-4.8%D+
Rev
+7.0%C+
0.38B+
D/E
0.30A-
0.4xA
P/S
—
1.10B+
PEG
1.00B+
—
P/E
29.1xB
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
FLR
TREX
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
78% above
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~24%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-51%
—
5-yr DCF upside
-44%
—
10-yr DCF upside
-32%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
FLR
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Earnings outpace cash
TREX
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
The companies
FLRFluor Corporation
Why now
Engineering & Construction · market cap $7.0b. 10% off the 52-week high of $57.93. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $60.69 (implying +17% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$330m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Currently unprofitable (margin -12.8%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. ROE -74% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
TREXTrex Company, Inc.
Why now
Building Products & Equipment · market cap $5.0b. Down 25% from 52-week high of $66.06 — deep drawdown territory. 18 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $54.67 (implying +10% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 117% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Beta 1.47 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where FLR and TREX diverge
On the headline score the gap is 44.8 points in favour of TREX. The widest single difference is Quality, where TREX leads by 60.0 points.
- QualityFLR 27.9 · TREX 87.9TREX +60.0
- GrowthFLR 14.1 · TREX 67.9TREX +53.8
- ValueFLR 55.3 · TREX 64.3TREX +9.0
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.