COMPARE · Data as of August 12, 2026
FLR vs STRL
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FLR scored 27.9, STRL scored 71.9 — STRL leads.
Compare another set
FLR
Fluor Corporation
27.9
$52.03 · $7.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
44.0
STRL leads
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
71.9
$548.95 · $16.8B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FLR
stronger →← stronger
STRL
28
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
84
14
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
97
55
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
45
STRL is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FLR
STRL
-$330mF
FCF
$482mC
-4.8%D+
Rev
+60.8%A
0.38B+
D/E
0.24A-
0.4xA
P/S
—
1.10B+
PEG
0.90B+
—
P/E
38.3xC+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
FLR
STRL
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
156% above
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~42%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-70%
—
5-yr DCF upside
-61%
—
10-yr DCF upside
-45%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
FLR
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Earnings outpace cash
STRL
Why this score
- Durable high returns
The companies
FLRFluor Corporation
Why now
Engineering & Construction · market cap $7.0b. 10% off the 52-week high of $57.93. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $60.69 (implying +17% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$330m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Currently unprofitable (margin -12.8%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. ROE -74% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
STRLSterling Infrastructure, Inc.
Why now
Engineering & Construction · market cap $16.8b. Down 45% from 52-week high of $1005.68 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +61% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.90 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $905.33 (implying +65% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 32% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 112% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 45% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.89 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trailing P/E 38x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where FLR and STRL diverge
On the headline score the gap is 44.0 points in favour of STRL. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthFLR 14.1 · STRL 97.4STRL +83.3
- QualityFLR 27.9 · STRL 84.0STRL +56.1
- ValueFLR 55.3 · STRL 45.4FLR +9.9
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.