COMPARE · Data as of August 12, 2026
FLR vs GFF
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FLR scored 27.9, GFF scored 78.7 — GFF leads.
Compare another set
FLR
Fluor Corporation
27.9
$52.03 · $7.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
50.8
GFF leads
GFF
Griffon Corporation
78.7
$104.88 · $4.8B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FLR
stronger →← stronger
GFF
28
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
80
14
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
83
55
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
73
GFF is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FLR
GFF
-$330mF
FCF
$297mC
-4.8%D+
Rev
+26.9%A-
0.38B+
D/E
—
0.4xA
P/S
—
1.10B+
PEG
0.54A-
—
P/E
22.3xB+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
FLR
GFF
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
17% above
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~12%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-24%
—
5-yr DCF upside
-15%
—
10-yr DCF upside
+0%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
FLR
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Earnings outpace cash
GFF
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
The companies
FLRFluor Corporation
Why now
Engineering & Construction · market cap $7.0b. 10% off the 52-week high of $57.93. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $60.69 (implying +17% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$330m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Currently unprofitable (margin -12.8%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. ROE -74% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
GFFGriffon Corporation
Why now
Building Products & Equipment · market cap $4.8b. 3% off the 52-week high of $108.57. Revenue growing +27% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.54 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $123.71 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 166% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where FLR and GFF diverge
On the headline score the gap is 50.8 points in favour of GFF. The widest single difference is Growth, where GFF leads by 68.9 points.
- GrowthFLR 14.1 · GFF 83.0GFF +68.9
- QualityFLR 27.9 · GFF 80.5GFF +52.6
- ValueFLR 55.3 · GFF 73.1GFF +17.8
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.