COMPARE · Data as of August 12, 2026
EME vs FLR
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. EME scored 76.4, FLR scored 27.9 — EME leads.
Compare another set
EME
EMCOR Group, Inc.
76.4
$833.40 · $36.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
48.5
EME leads
FLR
Fluor Corporation
27.9
$52.03 · $7.0B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
EME
stronger →← stronger
FLR
83
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
28
91
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
14
59
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
55
EME is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
EME
FLR
$1.2bC+
FCF
-$330mF
+18.9%B+
Rev
-4.8%D+
0.13A-
D/E
0.38B+
25.4xB+
P/E
—
0.40A
PEG
1.10B+
—
P/S
0.4xA
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
EME
FLR
96% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~25%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
-54%
1-yr DCF upside
—
-49%
5-yr DCF upside
—
-40%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
EME
Why this score
- Durable high returns
FLR
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Earnings outpace cash
The companies
EMEEMCOR Group, Inc.
Why now
Engineering & Construction · market cap $36.8b. 12% off the 52-week high of $951.96. Revenue growing +19%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.40 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $1,033 (implying +24% upside).
Moat
ROE 35% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
FLRFluor Corporation
Why now
Engineering & Construction · market cap $7.0b. 10% off the 52-week high of $57.93. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $60.69 (implying +17% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$330m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Currently unprofitable (margin -12.8%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. ROE -74% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where EME and FLR diverge
On the headline score the gap is 48.5 points in favour of EME. The widest single difference is Growth, where EME leads by 77.3 points.
- GrowthEME 91.4 · FLR 14.1EME +77.3
- QualityEME 82.8 · FLR 27.9EME +54.9
- ValueEME 58.9 · FLR 55.3EME +3.6
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.