COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
FLOC vs TDW
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FLOC scored 61.0, TDW scored 55.8 — FLOC leads.
Compare another set
FLOC
Flowco Holdings Inc.
61
$22.63 · $2.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
5.2
FLOC leads
TDW
Tidewater Inc.
55.8
$95.25 · $4.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestFLOC17.1x
- Fastest growthTDW-1.0%
- Strongest balance sheetFLOC0.25
- Highest qualityFLOC87 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueTDW-53%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FLOC
stronger →← stronger
TDW
87
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
68
45
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
43
57
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
60
FLOC is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FLOC
TDW
$208mC
FCF
$271mC
-9.4%D
Rev
-1.0%D+
0.25A-
D/E
0.45B
17.1xB
P/E
19.3xC+
1.14B+
PEG
0.18A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
FLOC
TDW
38% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
53% below
~-2%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-3%/yr
+39%
1-yr DCF upside
+60%
+62%
5-yr DCF upside
+112%
+103%
10-yr DCF upside
+228%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
FLOC
Why this score
- Short track record
TDW
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
FLOCFlowco Holdings Inc.
Why now
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services · market cap $2.5b. 20% off the 52-week high of $28.26. Revenue -9% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 9 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $31.00 (implying +37% upside).
Moat
Net margin 14% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Revenue contracting -9% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
TDWTidewater Inc.
Why now
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services · market cap $4.7b. Trading near 52-week high of $97.50 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. PEG 0.18 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $90.86 (implying -5% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 110% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Commodity exposure — earnings power tracks the price of the underlying commodity, not management execution. A 15-20% move in the commodity reprices the equity well before fundamentals catch up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where FLOC and TDW diverge
On the headline score the gap is 5.2 points in favor of FLOC. The widest single difference is Quality, where FLOC leads by 19.4 points.
- QualityFLOC 87.0 · TDW 67.6FLOC +19.4
- ValueFLOC 57.4 · TDW 60.3level
- GrowthFLOC 45.4 · TDW 42.7level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.